<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mystery Nokia Phone RM-324 With US 3G Appears on FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/</link>
	<description>News, Guides, Reviews, Videos for the Nokia Fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:33:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-9312</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-9312</guid>
		<description>It definitely looks like a 6650 T-Mobile, just compare this picture to a front view of. It&#039;s almost exactly the same except the sides don&#039;t show the port covers. As far as being a good replacement for the N75. HELL NO. The N75 as poor as it was in certain aspects (and I&#039;m talking about the carrier version) it was still a pretty good phone. I always thought the shell design of the N75 was a little cheap and should have been fit together better, and I love the metal outer shell design of the 6650, but I&#039;m not cool with the Motorola &quot;chin&quot; it has for the antenna. The N75 thankfully didn&#039;t have that. And frankly, the entire keypad on the 6650 is the dumbest thing Nokia has done next to an N96 with a 950mAh in it. The N75, aside from the D-pad design, which could have been a little bigger, is the best keypad design I have ever seen on a flip phone. I&#039;m sick of these flat razr-like keypads that every phone has now, and I&#039;m glad Nokia didn&#039;t do it to the N75. Yes the 6650 may have HSDPA, GPS, and A2DP, but the camera is on the front sadly, to accommodate for the battery, there&#039;s no stereo speakers, and the screen is smaller. As far as I&#039;m concerned, this is a step down in too many ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It definitely looks like a 6650 T-Mobile, just compare this picture to a front view of. It&#8217;s almost exactly the same except the sides don&#8217;t show the port covers. As far as being a good replacement for the N75. HELL NO. The N75 as poor as it was in certain aspects (and I&#8217;m talking about the carrier version) it was still a pretty good phone. I always thought the shell design of the N75 was a little cheap and should have been fit together better, and I love the metal outer shell design of the 6650, but I&#8217;m not cool with the Motorola &#8220;chin&#8221; it has for the antenna. The N75 thankfully didn&#8217;t have that. And frankly, the entire keypad on the 6650 is the dumbest thing Nokia has done next to an N96 with a 950mAh in it. The N75, aside from the D-pad design, which could have been a little bigger, is the best keypad design I have ever seen on a flip phone. I&#8217;m sick of these flat razr-like keypads that every phone has now, and I&#8217;m glad Nokia didn&#8217;t do it to the N75. Yes the 6650 may have HSDPA, GPS, and A2DP, but the camera is on the front sadly, to accommodate for the battery, there&#8217;s no stereo speakers, and the screen is smaller. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, this is a step down in too many ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adonis</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8561</link>
		<dc:creator>Adonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8561</guid>
		<description>Looks more like the newly announced 6650 now as Rita pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks more like the newly announced 6650 now as Rita pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8560</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8560</guid>
		<description>It really doesn&#039;t matter by the time Nokia gets this phone or any other 3g US phone to the market it will be obsolete. Any one remember the N75 and long that phone took to get to market. Also, the N95 8GB US 3g version still not available. It&#039;s amazing that Apple can get a phone to market on time and will most likely have the 3g iPhone out before any of the new Nokia&#039;s. PS.. was in Chicago this weekend trying to spend money on a new phone at the Nokia store but couldn&#039;t justify any of the Nokia phones when I have an iPhone (not the best but getting   better with each update) and a Blackberry Curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really doesn&#8217;t matter by the time Nokia gets this phone or any other 3g US phone to the market it will be obsolete. Any one remember the N75 and long that phone took to get to market. Also, the N95 8GB US 3g version still not available. It&#8217;s amazing that Apple can get a phone to market on time and will most likely have the 3g iPhone out before any of the new Nokia&#8217;s. PS.. was in Chicago this weekend trying to spend money on a new phone at the Nokia store but couldn&#8217;t justify any of the Nokia phones when I have an iPhone (not the best but getting   better with each update) and a Blackberry Curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Replacing The N75 With The 6651?</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8557</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T Replacing The N75 With The 6651?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8557</guid>
		<description>[...] TheNokiaBlog.com, yesterday posted a little treasure that he found on the FCC&#8217;s website, the RM-324, a Nokia handset rocking US 3G (WCDMA 850/1900MHz) for AT&amp;T&#8217;s HSDPA network. A commenter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TheNokiaBlog.com, yesterday posted a little treasure that he found on the FCC&#8217;s website, the RM-324, a Nokia handset rocking US 3G (WCDMA 850/1900MHz) for AT&amp;T&#8217;s HSDPA network. A commenter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mystery Nokia RM-324 Appears on FCC Site; Packs US HSDPA &#183; TechBlogger</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8549</link>
		<dc:creator>Mystery Nokia RM-324 Appears on FCC Site; Packs US HSDPA &#183; TechBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8549</guid>
		<description>[...] Read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Guim</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8548</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Guim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8548</guid>
		<description>An E90 NAM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An E90 NAM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita El Khoury</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8547</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita El Khoury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8547</guid>
		<description>Ya, definitely, this looks like a clamshell (or flip if you prefer). The proportions of width vs length say so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, definitely, this looks like a clamshell (or flip if you prefer). The proportions of width vs length say so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8546</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8546</guid>
		<description>Hope this isn&#039;t complete shit like the N75. I had one and it died within 4 months  (badly designed hinge that breaks under normal use). 

The N75 seemed to be a stupid lame version of their N series phones, an insult to us North Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope this isn&#8217;t complete shit like the N75. I had one and it died within 4 months  (badly designed hinge that breaks under normal use). </p>
<p>The N75 seemed to be a stupid lame version of their N series phones, an insult to us North Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandr3</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8539</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandr3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8539</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably a 6650 NAM... Flip and a good &quot;sucessor&quot; for the N75...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably a 6650 NAM&#8230; Flip and a good &#8220;sucessor&#8221; for the N75&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adonis</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8533</link>
		<dc:creator>Adonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8533</guid>
		<description>Purely looking at the outline, it kinda looks similar to the 8600 line-up. But I&#039;m thinking more like candybar/blackberry shape. E71 anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purely looking at the outline, it kinda looks similar to the 8600 line-up. But I&#8217;m thinking more like candybar/blackberry shape. E71 anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ying</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8528</link>
		<dc:creator>Ying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8528</guid>
		<description>I believe it&#039;s flip phone.

Read pdf &quot;Test Report 2&quot;. Notice under each test result the phrase &quot;Phone Flip Open&quot; and &quot;Phone Flip Closed&quot;.

The test also shows a Nokia BP-4L 1500mAh battery being used. Unfortunately, the only Nokia devices that uses this battery are the Nokia E61i, Nokia E90 Communicator, Nokia N810 Internet Tablet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it&#8217;s flip phone.</p>
<p>Read pdf &#8220;Test Report 2&#8243;. Notice under each test result the phrase &#8220;Phone Flip Open&#8221; and &#8220;Phone Flip Closed&#8221;.</p>
<p>The test also shows a Nokia BP-4L 1500mAh battery being used. Unfortunately, the only Nokia devices that uses this battery are the Nokia E61i, Nokia E90 Communicator, Nokia N810 Internet Tablet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-8525</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenokiablog.com/2008/03/02/mystery-nokia-phone-rm-324-with-us-3g-appears-on-fcc/#comment-8525</guid>
		<description>Woohoo, exciting ;-).
The hard edges on the left look more like a slider then a candybar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo, exciting <img src='http://thenokiablog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .<br />
The hard edges on the left look more like a slider then a candybar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
