Best motherboards 2017, the top Intel and AMD motherboards

The motherboard is the bedrock upon which your computer is built. It's arguably the single most important factor in your build. Everything from processor, to maximum RAM, to total number of drives, all depends on the motherboard to be stable and capable platform.

On top its importance as the foundation of your computer, a motherboard is one component that can't easily be swapped out. For instance, if your graphics card quits or no longer fits your needs, it's not hard to swap it out for a flashy new one. But if your motherboard quits, or you find yourself needing more PCIe slots or RAM, you basically have to rip the whole thing apart. 

That's why getting a good motherboard is so important. The sheer number of options, from chipset to form factor to available ports, makes motherboard shopping somewhat daunting. The good news is, it doesn't have to be. We've compiled this list of the best motherboards by chipset and form factor, so you can start building the computer of your dreams right now.

Coming to terms

Before we get into the recommendations, a little bit of a primer for  the uninitiated. Motherboards come in several different form factors,  the most common of which are ATX and Micro ATX. There are a whole bunch  of other form factors, but generally speaking, the case you end up  buying will probably support one or both of these sizes.

A  socket-type refers to the actual socket where the processor "plugs into”  the motherboard itself. Different manufacturers have different sockets  for their CPUs, and different CPUs from the same manufacturer might not  share a common socket. For example, Intel Core processors come in  LGA1151 – but, also LGA1155 – and sometimes LGA1150. AMD processors also  have varying socket sizes.

This absolute beast from EVGA is an Intel builder's dream. It has dual Ethernet ports, HDMI and DisplayPort, Thunderbolt and USB Type-C, along with an "enthusiast layout" for easy SLI builds. It's overclockable, with 3 BIOS profiles to support that basic human need to make a computer go way over its limits. It also comes with "enthusiast stickers." Who doesn't love stickers?

You don't need to break the bank to get your computer off on the right footing. This board from MSI is a great, inexpensive solution. It's limited in options for future expansions, so it's ideal for a one-and-done build. Since it's a gaming motherboard it has support for things like "Mystic Light Sync," which lets you synchronize all your RGB lighting with a single click.  

This Micro ATX motherboard from ASRock packs a lot of features onto a smaller form factor. You lose out on the possibility of extra PCIe slots, but there are 4 memory slots to upgrade to a maximum 64GB DDR4 RAM. It also has support for on-board graphics, so if you're building a computer piecemeal, you can still use it before buying a dedicated graphics card.

This small motherboard packs a punch. Not only does it support Intel HD graphics, it also has a "SafeSlot" PCIe slot that's reinforced to better hold today's positively monstrous graphics cards. On top of that, it's actually really cool looking, with RGB lighting that syncs with other AURA Sync-enabled peripherals and products.

When it comes to AMD motherboards, the Gaming Pro Carbon from MSI does not mess around in the slightest. Not only is it packed with lots of features to make it extra appealing for AMD gaming PC builds, it has awesome Mystic Light RGB settings that can be adjusted via smartphone app. Besides looking great, it has plenty of room for expansion and support for dual graphics cards.

Budget builds are almost always based around AMD hardware. Not because AMD is "budget," but because it's just cheaper than Intel and Nvidia. Start the build off on the right, low-cost foot with this motherboard from ASUS. It has everything you need to pull off a solid computer build, without having to break the bank. It lacks visual bells and whistles, but hey, it's a budget solution.

If you want to get where you need to go, and you don't care about things like fancy RGB lighting or eye-catching, futuristic-looking heat dissipators, the AB350M Pro4 is the motherboard for you. In spite of its plain-Jane looks and no-frills aesthetic, this is a solid motherboard with plenty of room to expand and grow with your computer needs.

Small and powerful, this ASRock motherboard is a beast, supporting overclocked memory speeds up to 3,466MHz for CPUs that support it. If that wasn't enough to get your motor running, it also supports 4K resolutions and full Blu-ray support through its HDMI ports. Yes, ports: it has two, as well as on-board video support.

The X-series processors are here and they're spectacular, so if you want to take advantage of all they have to offer, you need an X-series motherboard. This ASRock X299 is an excellent choice, with support for overclocked memory speeds up to 4400MHz(!!!) and 8 different slots for memory modules. It also supports up to 128GB of RAM, so with an X-series processor and a good graphics card (or 3…) this thing will absolutely tear apart anything you throw at it.

If you're the type of builder with deep pockets and an "everything and the kitchen sink" build mentality, this Ryzen Threadripper board is definitely for you. It supports 4-way SLI or Crossfire configurations, so you can just empty your bank account in the name of PC glory. All that graphical power is supported by as much as 128GB DDR4 memory, and there's even a flashy RBG lighting scheme to really drive home the point.

Best horror movies: fantastic films to stream or buy in 2017 in the US

Hello! Welcome to TechRadar’s guide to all things terrible, where you will find all of the best horror movies you can watch on Netflix, Amazon or Hulu in the US.

For one reason or another, people just love scaring themselves stupid with horror films. There’s really not any other genre that can inspire the same raw emotional response that a well-crafted horror movie can, and the best horror movies are guaranteed to stay in your head for weeks (or even months) on end.

After traversing our nightmares from years of watching horror movies, we’ve constructed a list of the best horror films you can stream from the comfort and supposed safety of your own home.

Now, sit down and steel yourself while you still can; we’re diving deep down into the best horror movies available to stream today.

If we’re not counting Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho, Rosemary’s Baby is likely one of the most significant horror films of all time. Roman Polanski’s mercilessly dark story of an expecting mother and the malevolence that befalls her is a classic by any measure, even earning a prestigious placement in the National Film Registry at the Library of Congress. If you’ve never watched Polanski’s horrifying film, it sinks into deep and dark territory that is still unnerving even 50 years after its initial release. 

Directed by the unequaled Ridley Scott, Alien remains a milestone of both horror and science fiction. The story of the unlucky crew of the spacecraft known as the Nostromo, led by Sigourney Weaver’s iconic Ripley, and their run-in with a brutal alien stowaway is still a savagely exhilarating thrill ride from beginning to end. While the later films in the Alien franchise each pursued separate goals and flip-flopped on their genres, the original from 1979 still stands as a perfectly executed opus in horror cinema with no lack of twists and turns along the way. 

The Babadook takes the cheap jump scares and loud dissonant music of horror’s past and replaces them with a subtle and eerie story of a distressed mother and her relationship with her child. Revolving around a creepy children’s book, the plot melds together a conventional horror story with a down-to-Earth look at grief, loss and other psychological issues with great finesse. The final product is a movie unlike any other on this list and is absolutely essential watching for anyone with even a passing interest in horror cinema. 

Much like Joss Whedon’s recent movie, Cabin in the Woods, Scream is a razor sharp spoof of the cliches we have come to expect in the horror (more specifically slasher) genre. Even past the commentary though, is an intriguing “whodunit” mystery that quickly turns into genuine terror. The late legendary director Wes Craven commands this instant classic and helps make it the intelligent and downright horrifying Halloween night standard that it is. 

Steven Spielberg’s breakout work created a legendary nationwide panic of swimming in the ocean during the summer of 1975 and still stands out in our mind every time we go for a swim. While special effects of the time kept the shark itself from being a realistic creature of nightmare, Spielberg wisely kept the beast hidden for most of the film, slowly building up the suspense to an almost unbearable level. While we wouldn’t necessarily classify this movie as a horror movie, it’s indisputable that Jaws has terrified audiences for over 40 years.  .  

The very origin of modern found footage horror movies is still one of the very best films in the style. The Blair Witch Project is a low budget film that follows three film students who are looking to investigate an urban legend known as the Blair Witch. They then disappear into the woods and are never seen again. The next year, the footage is found (hence the name “found footage”) and the horror that was inflicted upon them is shown for all to see.

The Blair Witch Project works so well because of this unique shooting style. The found footage style gave it a sense of realism that is often missing from horror movies. This is a legendary cult horror film and should be seen by anybody who cares about the genre.  

The Witch is…quite unlike any other horror movie you’ve seen. Robert Eggers’ tale of a family in 1630 New England is a subtle yet deeply disturbing spiritual thriller that features all sorts of unexpected turns.

The story is of a devout Protestant family who is burdened with all sorts of evil, which causes them to turn on each other and reveal a  different sort of evil altogether. While it isn’t a historically accurate reflection of America’s Puritan past, it’s a dark and disturbing art film that is unlike anything you’ve ever seen. 

Although the Cloverfield title is attached, don’t be fooled – it’s only superficially connected to the first monster flick. Rather, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a dark and malicious thriller that keeps you trying to figure out which side you’re on for much of its runtime. Anchored by sublime performances from its small cast, 10 Cloverfield Lane is deeply unnerving and will rattle around in your brain for hours on end long after the credits have rolled, even if it doesn’t fit perfectly into the generic horror movie mold. 

James Wan is quickly becoming one of the best horror directors around, repeatedly delivering terrifying and unique films in a genre that’s become plagued with cliches and copycats. (Spoiler alert: this isn’t the last time you’ll see Wan on this list.) Insidious easily could have been a throwaway film in lesser hands, being yet another film about a family who moves into a mysterious house only to have things things begin to go awry. With a great cast and an even better director however, the tried and true horror tropes feel fresh, at least for the first two acts. While this isn’t Wan’s best film, it’s a brilliantly made horror film that does all the old tricks right. 

If you’re afraid of tight spaces and the walls closing in around you, this is the horror film for you. Director Neil Marshall, helmer of the upcoming Hellboy reboot, delivers a horror film that’s stuffed with jump scares and cliches, but remains a terrifying experience that literally takes your breath away. If the premise of trapped cave divers and horrible creatures in the dark is scary to you, just wait until you’ve sat through it.

The most fun film on this list by a country mile has to be Tucker and Dale vs. Evil. The film begins on solid ground by casting two of the funniest, and sadly underrated actors working today: Tyler Labine and Alan Tudyk. Pepper in an insane premise where these innocent and lovable hillbillies are mistaken for chain-saw wielding maniacs and you’ve got a blood-ridden good time. If blood and guts aren’t a dealbreaker for you, throw this one on with some friends and get ready for a great time. 

Sadly, Bone Tomahawk was almost wholly overlooked by the general moviegoing audience. For those who missed out, Kurt Russell leads a stellar cast in a film about the collision of a classic cowboy sheriff and a gang of vicious cannibals. The end result is a brilliant marriage of the western and horror genre’s that plays to the strengths of both. While it’s not a perfect film, Kurt Russell and his supporting cast are all perfect in it. Although it’s a bit longer than your standard horror flick, Bone Tomahawk is well worth the investment.  

When Stephen King and Stanley Kubrick are both in a film’s credits, you know you’re in for a treat. And while King hasn’t been shy about his disdain for this “unfaithful adaptation,” there’s no one that knows film like Kubrick. Although its immortalized by the infamous axe scene in the image above, the entire film is comprised of a tight script, suspenseful direction, and a brilliant performance by Jack Nicholson as the increasingly terrifying Jack Torrence. Stephen King may not have liked this one, but we sure love it. 

Silence of the Lambs virtually wrote the playbook on psychological thrillers. This Academy Award-winning adaptation of the novel of the same name is propelled by characters as timeless as film itself. Jodie Foster’s Clarice must turn to the incarcerated cannibalistic Hannibal Lecter to try and get inside the mind of a despicable serial killer who’s still at large. The end product is a chilling and suspenseful drama with notes of horror that won’t leave you anytime soon. If you’ve never seen Silence of the Lambs, strap in and treat yourself to a true suspense classic.

An American Werewolf in London is a brilliant piece of comedy horror that earns its rightful spot as a cult classic. The film follows two American students on a tour of Britain who are mauled by a werewolf, killing one of them. The survivor has nightmares of being a werewolf and suddenly has visions of his friend and others convincing him to break the werewolf curse. Sounds weird, right? It’s weird and all the better for it. Pop some popcorn and throw this one on for a slightly lighter time in the horror realm.

After a career like the Arnold has had, the last thing you’d expect is for him to churn out a brilliant dramatic performance in an indie-horror-drama flick. But alas, the Governator does just that as Wade Vogel in Maggie. 

The film falls in a post-apocalyptic world in which Wade’s daughter has been infected with the virus that turns humans into zombies. Although she still has her wits and her personality, the clock is ticking to the moment that Wade must make the ultimate decision. It’s a surprisingly heart wrenching story with top-notch performances all around. Chalk this one up as an unexpected joy to watch – or at least as joyful as zombie stories can be. 

James Wan’s second entry on this list is his best film to date. It’s also one of the best horror movies of the last 20 years. The Conjuring is taken from the real life case files of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren and details a family in Rhode Island that is plagued with satanic spirits. The Warrens must face this evil and prevent it from consuming everyone involved. 

The fact that this film, although dramatized, is drawn from real life case files that can be read to this day makes it that much more horrifying and intriguing. Although James Wan is undoubtedly poised to do many more fantastic films, The Conjuring currently stands as his most impressive feat in this difficult to master genre. 

Scott Derrickson may well be a Marvel maestro now but he cut his tooth on horror movies – and great ones at that. Sinister is his best, a creepy heart-wrenching movie centred on a true-crime writer who moves into a new home and finds a box of Super 8 snuff movies. The film takes its time to tell its tale but when it does, it’s pretty horrifying. Ethan Hawke plays the author who discovers the chilling secret, raising this above your average horror yarn. 

Mick Taylor should be up there with Freddy and Jason in the pantheon of horror monsters. He may well look like a regular Ozzy guy who likes a Tooheys New or two, but underneath all that he’s a serial killer who likes to kill tourists in some of the most inventive ways possible. Interestingly, John Jarratt – unknown outside Australia – was an inspired choice for Mick.  The reason: he was the good guy in hit show McLeod’s Daughters, so it completely flipped his good guy image. 

This is not a film for the faint hearted. It’s about revenge, it features some of the most horrific acts of violence ever put to film but it’s also a compelling, if flinching watch. Directed by genius Korean director  Jee-woon Kim, who also did the amazing The Quiet Family, the film is a masterpiece in shock and awe, focusing on a serial killer who is hunted by a retired cop who has vengeance on his mind. 

South Korea is on a roll when it comes to its horror movies, with Train To Busan being one of its recent best. The plot is ingenious: unbeknownst to the public a zombie outbreak is happening in Seoul. We see the effect on this on a fast train to Busan where the outbreak takes over the speeding train and threatens all the passengers on board. This is one of the most frenetic zombie films ever, filled with some fantastic set pieces and a helluva lot of tension.

Hell House LLC is an under appreciated gem. It’s a found footage horror movie that really does shock and scare you throughout. The premise is simple: a group of entrepreneurs have created a horror house for frat boys and others to scare themselves silly in. The problem is, the house actually seems to be haunted. Regardless of it being a little known movie, this is one of the best horror movies to be released in years.

Camera rumors 2017: the biggest and best camera rumors around

Camera rumors for 2017 are, unavoidably, in the news every day, even with CES 2018 just a couple months away and Photokina 2018 a year away. But, with a finger on the pulse of the latest industry trends and gossip, and with a bit of our own tech expertise, we’ll look at what the biggest names in the camera industry may be dreaming up.

We’ve sorted through all of the recent camera rumors, from wild conjecture to the most plausible leaks, and brought you the biggest and the best. With these rumors, we can start to get an idea of what major camera companies might be aiming to release, and what eager photographers will be able to get their hands on in the near future.

Let’s look at all of the rumors circling around for each of the major camera companies, from Canon to Olympus.

Canon rumors: We have already seen the EOS-1D X Mark II, EOS 5D Mark IV and EOS 6D Mark II, what else are we possibly going to see? Canon's recently released the EOS M5, but will we see a full-frame mirrorless camera from Canon?

Nikon rumors: The Nikon D850 is already here, but could we also see an update to the underrated retro-inspired Df? The Nikon D750 could do with an upgrade, too. 

Sony rumors: We've just had the release of the Alpha A9, so we could maybe see a 70MP+ sensor in an Alpha A7R III next. 

Fujifilm rumors: Fuji's been very prolific recently – we've had the GFX 50S, X-T20 and X100F, while last year saw the amazing X-T2 and X-Pro2, but we could see the 24MP sensor make its way into updates for the X70 and X-E2S?

Olympus rumors: There is speculation we could maybe see a replacement to the brand's wonderful OM-D E-M10 II

Panasonic rumors: With a slew of announcements at Photokina including the long awaited Lumix GH5, things are a little hush at the moment.  

Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark III

Canon's premium PowerShot compact camera could get an overhaul

Predicted specs: New APS-C size sensor | 24-120mm zoom lens | Dual Pixel CMOS AF

Get ready for a new PowerShot G1 X Mark III soon, according to new information from CanonRumors. With the Mark II now being well over three and a half years old, it isn’t exactly surprising. If the rumors are, in fact, accurate, the spec will take a huge jump ahead as well. Instead of the weirdly-sized 1.5-inch sensor, the Mark III is likely going to get the same 24.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor that's featured in devices like the EOS Rebel T7i (EOS 800D), while it'll also get the latest DIGIC 7 image processor and Dual Pixel CMOS AF. Zoom range is rumored to stay the same at 24-120mm, but the jury's still out on whether or not we'll get a built-in EVF.    

Canon full-frame mirrorless camera

If the rumors are true, Canon is working on a full-frame mirrorless camera

Predicted specs: The sensor from the 1D X Mark II or 5D Mark IV | Existing lens mount

CanonRumors is also reporting gossip that Canon is making a mirrorless full-frame camera, and the best thing is that it's probably going to use an existing lens mount, which is in all likelihood causing the engineers at Canon some major problems.  

Nikon D760

A gentle upgrade over the ageing D750 would strengthen Nikon’s FX offerings

Predicted specs: Full-frame 36.3MP sensor | 4K video recording | Tilting touchscreen

The D750 has slowly become an esteemed and inexpensive full-frame choice in Nikon’s lineup, but it came out more than two years ago and could really use a boost to contend against a number of more recent full-frame arrivals. Nikon Rumors has reported that a Honduran newspaper – of all places – has reported that a D760 is incoming, so what could this mean? If the D820 is released with even more pixels, could we be seeing the D760 take advantage of the 36.3MP sensor to replace the current 24MP chip? A high shutter speed of 1/8,000sec might be in the cards, which is likely because the D750’s maximum 1/4,000sec shutter speed is an understandable concession to help it to be more affordably priced, but a concession nevertheless. 

It would be shocking to have such a camera release without 4K video recording, especially after the 4K-enabled D500 and D5. It’s also likely that it will have a tilting display like the D750, but Nikon would probably want this to match its D500 sibling in implementing touch sensitivity, too.

Nikon Df II

Nikon Df II

Perhaps Nikon will turn its retro-styled FX SLR into a retro-styled FX CSC?

Predicted specs: Mirrorless design | Class-leading electronic viewfinder | Nikon F-mount

People got extremely enthusiastic about the DF when it was announced, but its high price and relatively low pixel count compared to the D810 made it more of a luxury purchase. The traditional controls also aren't quite as well implemented as on Fuji's X-T1, which was released at around the same time.

It's possible that the Df II will only fix the handling problems of the Df and have a higher resolution sensor – possibly even using the D5's 20MP sensor. Still, it's no secret that Nikon has lost some of its market share to Sony and its Alpha 7-series of full-frame retro-styled compact system cameras, and the manufacturer needs to have a comeback.

Speculation has been floating around for a while that Nikon has a full-frame mirrorless model coming soon, and the Df design has the capability to be a great starting point – albeit with a few major changes, like the removal of the mirror and the inclusion of an electronic viewfinder.

With 2017 being Nikon's centenary year, we could see Nikon releasing the DF II this year.

Nikon 1 J%

Nikon 1 system

Will we ever see another Nikon 1 mirrorless camera again?

The last Nikon 1 system camera was the 1 J5, announced way back at the beginning of April 2015, and we haven't seen any sign of a new model since then.

The arrival of Nikon's new range of DL compact cameras at the beginning of last year, all featuring 1.0-inch, 21MP sensors, with specifications that seemed to cast a shadow of the current 1 system offerings, with many people questioning the need for Nikon's current mirrorless offering now these compacts had arrived.

These models though, after over a year of delays have been cancelled, but there hasn't been a whiff of a 1 system rumor in ages either. Could Nikon be quietly be surrendering? 

Sony Alpha

Sony Alpha A9R

Could Sony launch a high-end pro-spec mirrorless flagship camera?

Predicted specs: Full-frame 70-80MP sensor | Same body as Alpha A9 

With the arrival of the fabulous looking 24MP, 20fps Alpha 9, what can we expect next from Sony? 

While the full-frame 42MP Alpha 7R II is clearly still has one of the best sensors available, we can't help but speculate that Sony are going to try and get even more pixels on a full-frame sensor, potentially almost doubling the resolution offered by the A7R II and pitting it against medium format cameras. 

Put this sensor in the Alpha A9's body with its more polished control layout and the Alpha A9R could be a monster of a camera.

Sony Alpha A7 III

Rumors are growing that we could see an update to Sony's enthusiast full-frame mirrorless camera

Predicted specs: Full-frame 24MP sensor | Joystick AF control | Advanced AF system

Rumors are starting to pick-up that we'll see an update to the Alpha A7 II, and one that'll benefit from the trickle-down of technology from the Alpha 9

That means we could see the 24MP sensor make its way into a more affordable body, and while we don't expect to see it capable of rattling off 20fps to rival the A9, we should see a serious speed increase too. 

We'd also be surprised if the A7 III gets the same awesome 693-point AF system as the A9, but again, we'd expect to see a big leap over the AF system in the A7 II. To quickly toggle between AF points, expect Sony to give the A7 III the same mini joystick that's on the A9.

Fuji X200

Fujifilm X70F

A new sensor and processing engine, plus an improved AF system look on the cards for Fujifilm's pocket premium compact camera

Predicted specs: 24MP APS-C format sensor | 28mm equivalent lens | Improved AF system

We've just had the X100F announced with a number of new improvements, so we can expect Fujifilm to turn its attention to the X70 update next.

We'd be incredibly surprised if it doesn't get a resolution upgrade, increasing the pixel count from 16 million to 24 million as we've seen with Fuji's other recent announcements.

We reckon Fujifilm will stick with the 28mm equivalent prime lens, but it might be tempted to up the ante a little by increasing the maximum aperture from f/2.8 to f/2 for even better low light performance and depth of field control, but it may 'just' use a new optical design or coatings to boost performance.

Or perhaps we'll see multiple versions – maybe one with a fast 50mm f/1.8 equivalent optic. 

Fujifilm has been working hard on improving the autofocus systems in its cameras, and this seems likely to continue, so we can expect the X70F to focus more quickly than the X70, with better low-light responses.

Fujifilm X-E3

A moderate update to Fujifilm affordable rangefinder-style mirrorless camera

Predicted specs: 24MP APS-C format sensor | Touchscreen | 4K video capture

The current rangefinder-styled X-E2S sits alongside the popular X-T10 in the Fujifilm mirrorless range. While one of the newer models, it's the odd-one-out when it comes to its sensor, utilising the ageing 16MP chip, so we'd expect a X-E3 with a 24MP sensor to fall into line with the rest of the range.

AF is likely to be tweaked for snappier performance, while we could see a touchscreen and 4K video capture.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

It's still one of our favorite mirrorless cameras, but the E-M10 II is almost two years old now. Will we see a refreshed model soon?

Predicted specs: 16MP Micro Four Thirds sensor | Core features to remain the same | 4K video

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 II is one of our favorite mirrorless cameras – it's a compact powerhouse of a camera with great handling and spec, but it's now almost two years old now and with the likes of Fujifilm's X-T20 giving it some stiff competition, we would be surprized to see a Mark III model.

43rumors.com is reporting that we'll see one very soon, and has even got hold of what it believes to be the specification. From the looks of it, the core specification will remain the same, with the E-M10 III featuring the same 16MP resolution and excellent 5-axis image stabilization, though we're likely to see 4K video capture. Focusing could also get a bump up to 121 points.

Best 32-inch TVs of 2017: the best secondary TVs for any budget

Most of the tele talk these days is about Ultra HD / 4K TVs, and generally the super-sized ones too. Companies like Samsung are even talking about how 55-inch screens have become their biggest selling TV size.

While the days when a 32-inch TV was considered the height of show-off AV opulence may be long gone, the 32-inch TV has certainly not gone out of fashion. On the contrary, it continues to be one of the biggest-selling segments of the TV market – and this really isn’t a surprise when you think about it. 

When households are putting TVs in second, third, and even fourth rooms, the 32-inch screen size offers a perfect balance between affordability and practicality: It’s big enough to be comfortably viewable even in typically large rooms such as kitchens and conservatories, but not so big that it overwhelms smaller spaces such as bedrooms or studies.

Which TVs does TechRadar recommend?

While there always exceptions to the rule, we’ve come up with a list of a few things to look for when buying a new 32-inch TV. 

First off, it pays to be smart. Second-room TVs can benefit more from a good range of ‘smart’ features than main living room TVs. After all, it’s clearly much easier to watch content streamed wirelessly over the internet on a second room TV than go to the hassle of trying to install an aerial point or second-room set-top box. With this in mind, we’d recommend that you try and get a 32-inch TV with built-in Wi-Fi that carries integrated video streaming services and supports DLNA file sharing from other devices on your network.

Second, shoot for a 1920×1080 resolution wherever possible. Pretty much every 32-inch TV these days is classed as ‘HD Ready’, meaning it has a high definition resolution and can play high definition sources. There are, though, two different resolutions that meet the HD Ready criteria: 1366×768, and ‘full HD’ 1920×1080. A set with a 1920×1080 resolution has the potential to give you cleaner, crisper, more detailed pictures than 1366×768 screens.

Lastly, just make sure the TV you have in mind has all the connections you need. For instance, PS4s, Xbox Ones and DVD/Blu-ray players will need HDMIs, the Nintendo Wii will need a component or even composite video input, PCs will likely need a VGA input, and Sky/Cable set top boxes will need another HDMI. Once you’ve got your list together, make sure your chosen TV has enough connections to handle everything without you having to keep swapping connection cables over.

Keep these tips in mind (along with the additional in-depth tips offered on page two) and you should have no problem finding the small screen of your dreams. 

However, just in case you can’t find something, we’ve come up with a short list of what we think our the best 32-inch TVs of 2017 to help you along. 

We’ve chosen to highlight Sony's 32RE4 because, uniquely, it supports high dynamic range video. The screen won’t be bright enough to do HDR full justice, but any sort of HDR impact is welcome. Gamers may be particularly drawn to it given the HDR potential of the Xbox One S and PS4 consoles. Unlike 4K, HDR doesn’t need a big screen to deliver palpable picture quality improvements. Just remember you’ll need to feed the TV HDR sources to unlock its HDR potential.

line

VIZIO has never been known for catchy or easy to remember model names, so it's only fitting that one of the best small screens from the company has a name like D32X-D1. While it might not have the catchiest name in the world, VIZIO's small screen has a lot going for it – including a full 1080p resolution and an app tray full of the most popular streaming services like Netflix, YouTube and Hulu. 

Samsung has been a leader in the 32-inch screen space for years. The top of the line model from the South Korean manufacturer this year is the UN32M5300. Why? It offers full 1080p images and its Tizen operating system for a price that most folks can afford. Sure, it doesn't have the most connections in the world, but hey, the small compromises are absolutely worth it.

line

The 32LJ610V is a bit on the ugly side by 32-inch TV standards, and it uses an IPS panel, making it a bad option for dark room environments. However, its picture is bright enough to stand out in light rooms, and best of all its webOS smart TV system makes it fantastically easy to use. Two out of three isn't so bad, right?

line

If you’re still rocking shelves full of DVDs or you’ve got a habit of popping the latest bargain bucket DVD title in with your weekly shopping, this new Toshiba model features a built-in DVD drive. 

It likely won’t rival the other models here on all-round picture quality, but it still looks attractive despite its combi design, and supports the Freeview Play smart system in the UK. Which adds up to a lot of features for its £299 price tag.

  • Head on over to page two to read more about 32-inch TVs!

Hopefully by now you’ve realized that you shouldn’t take buying a 32-inch TV lightly, even if it’s intended for a second room. An ‘impulse’ second room TV purchase – especially one based on just trying to get the cheapest model you can find – can often easily end in tears and a sense of money wasted – if a set doesn’t give you the features and performance traits your set up needs.

But what, exactly, should you be searching for beyond a 1080p resolution, a bevy of ports and smart functionality? Here are five more things. 

Get connected

While not often considered for TVs, Bluetooth support might also be handy – especially if you want to quickly stream music from your smart devices to the TV’s speakers. However, such support isn’t common in the 32-inch TV market, and so a TV not having it likely shouldn’t be seen as a deal breaker.

When it comes to built-in video streaming services, your 32-inch TV will ideally carry apps for Netflix, Amazon Video, and the catch up services of the UK’s four main broadcasters: The BBC iPlayer, the ITV Hub, All4 and My5. Now TV may be a handy extra bonus too.

Finding all of these services – or even a good percentage of them – on a single 32-inch TV can be quite a challenge, though, if you try to save money and look beyond the main LG/Samsung/Sony/Panasonic brands, which all combine relatively strong app support with far more advanced and friendly interfaces than you tend to get with ‘b-list’ brands. 

As the icing on the cake, you could also consider a 32-inch TV that carries either Freeview Play or YouView. These apps present the UK’s catch-up TV services in a convenient ‘wrapper’ that includes an electronic programme guide you can scroll back through time as well as forwards, making it easier to hunt down shows you’ve missed. At the time of writing, though, we believe only Panasonic offers this sort of functionality (in the form of Freeview Play) on its 32-inch TVs.

Go beyond resolution

Like we mentioned earlier, resolution is important. However, resolution is only one part of a TV’s overall picture performance, so it is possible for a 720p TV with better motion processing, colour management and backlighting to produce better pictures than a low quality 1080 set. Try and consider a screen’s picture claims and features as a whole, rather than focussing on a single specification.

Image courtesy of Samsung

IPS vs VA panels

There are essentially two types of 32-inch LCD panel technology out there: IPS and VA. IPS panels offer slightly wider viewing angles, while VA panels support much better contrast.

With big screen ‘main’ TVs likely to be used for watching films, sometimes with the lights dimmed, the lack of contrast with IPS screens can become a big issue, causing dark scenes to look washed out. So if you’re looking for a 32-inch TV to go into a relatively dark environment, a VA panel is a must.

IPS panel contrast issues are less problematic in bright rooms such as conservatories and kitchens, though, and the (slight) IPS viewing angle advantage can also be handy in such large environments where viewers may be using the TV while walking around the room.

It can be hard to find out for sure what sort of panel a particular 32-inch TV uses, but it’s definitely worth pursuing if you’re a movie fan or gamer looking to use a TV in a dark room. To get you started, all LG TVs use IPS panels, and pretty much all Samsung TVs use VA panels. Other brands tend to use a mixture of IPS and VA panels across different parts of their ranges.

Gaming mode

The 32-inch screen size is understandably popular with gamers. But some 32-inch TVs handle gaming much better than others. Motion issues are particularly critical to gaming, so if you’re able to see a few sets running look out for the motion-related issues mentioned in the previous section.

How quickly a 32-inch TV renders image data received at its inputs – something known as input lag – is also a critical issue for gamers. Unfortunately, though, this is seldom a specification that’s quoted by manufacturers, and while it’s something we cover in our TV tests, getting 32-inch TVs to test is proving next to impossible difficult these days.

At the very least, though, any 32-inch TV a gamer buys ought to at least carry a Game picture preset. This shows that a brand has at least thought about gaming by providing a mode optimised for it – and usually one of the key features of such game modes is keeping input lag to a minimum.

Don't get hung up on design

One strange thing about the second-room TV market dominated by 32-inch models is that people seem much more likely to get obsessed by specific design requirements than they do with the main living room TV. Especially when it comes to the set’s colour (white, for instance, is in especially high demand for kitchens and conservatories).

Presumably some consumers think that with second-room TVs the usual picture quality concerns become relatively unimportant, as the TV will only be used ‘casually’. Our advice would be, though, that you try not to let design conditions limit your TV choice since experience shows that actually, smart features and some aspects of picture quality – especially brightness and, with gamers, motion clarity – are even more important to the effectiveness of second room TVs than they are to main living room TVs.

Sound quality

Far too many 32-inch TVs treat sound as an after thought, even though it’s a key part of any viewing experience. It can be tricky to judge a TV’s likely audio performance, though, without hearing it for yourself.

All you can do is look for rated speaker output specifications (even though these are notoriously unreliable) and clues in a TV’s design; forward firing speakers, built-in bass woofers, enough space on the rear to allow air to ‘move’, and so on.

To DVD, or not to DVD

Finally, if you want to limit secondary kit clutter around a 32-inch TV in a second room, there are still a small number of 32-inch TVs out there that carry built-in DVD players. The 32-inch Toshiba 32D3753DB, the Bush DLED32265HDDVDW and the Cello C32227FT2, for instance.

However, none of the ‘big four’ TV brands support this feature any more, leaving you having to consider second tier manufacturers – with potential negative impact on picture quality and smart features – if you’re still a DVD user.

TVs with built-in Blu-ray players are not available at the time of writing, by the way. So don’t forget that when you’re using a built-in DVD player you’re having to watch a standard definition picture being upscaled – often by rather average processing – to the TV screen’s HD resolution.

Best true wireless earbuds: the best AirPod alternatives around

Update: We've had a chance to try out the Sony WF-1000X true wireless headphones, and we were sufficiently impressed with them to award them a space on our list of the best true wireless earbuds. Sony's earbuds impressed us by packing noise-cancellation technology into their tiny shells, and they're now sitting at number two on the list. 

Best True Wireless Earbuds Buying Guide: Welcome to TechRadar's round-up of the best true wireless earbuds you can buy for any budget in 2017.

Apple AirPods are great if you own an iPhone and don’t mind people calling you “that person who wears those funny Apple earphones”.

For the rest of us, there are plenty of other options. A whole new category of 'true wireless' earphones has emerged, enabling you do away with headphone cables entirely. 

Early models were expensive, suffered from terrible wireless performance and often just didn’t sound good enough. But we’ve picked through the cream of the current crop to bring you the best AirPods alternatives around.

The Jabra Elite Sport are currently the ultimate true wireless earphones for runners and other kinds of athletes. There’s a heart rate sensor on the right earpiece, letting it monitor your exertion level as you exercise. 

A Jabra companion app lets you track your exercise, and you can kick off a workout by pressing a button on one earpiece. Unlike most rivals there are also volume/playback controls on the left earpiece too.

The heart rate tracker is more reliable than most wrist-worn models, as long as you fit the Elite Sport buds properly. And the fit is going to split the audience a bit. 

The Jabra Elite Sport don't perch in your ears, they fill them rather like a custom moulded earphone. As a result sound isolation is excellent and the fit very secure. Some will find it too invasive, though. 

Road runners need to be double-careful about nearby traffic, although they’re excellent at getting rid of terrible gym techno. Jabra offers another solution too. Double-tap one of the buttons and you enter HearThrough mode, which pipes through some ambient sound without ruining your music. This kind of mode often sounds horrible, but it doesn’t here. 

Jabra recently updated the Elite Sport to boost stamina to a better-than-average 4.5 hours peer charge. And while the carry case only offers enough juice for two bonus charges rather than the 10-15 of some others, it’s a very handy little thing: the size of a cufflinks box.

Sound quality is among the best you’ll hear from this kind of earphone. It’s wide and rich, seeming expansive and dynamic enough to do justice to your music. You don’t have too think of these as “just for exercise” earphones.

However, the Onkyo W800BT sound better still. They have better mid-range texture and superior bass control/balance. The higher treble registers of the Jabra Elite Sport also seem a little tamed to our ears, leading to sound that, while good, seems manipulated rather than a flat frequency response.

Read the full review: Jabra Elite Sport

Considering it's still rare to get noise-cancellation in wired earbuds at all, the fact that Sony has managed to pack it into a pair that are not only wireless, but true wireless is very impressive indeed. 

The Sony WF-1000X manage to offer a level of noise-cancellation that's very good for a pair of earbuds. It won't offer the same isolation as a pair of over-ear cans, but if you're after a sleek form factor then the compromise is worth it. 

Beyond the noise-cancellation the earbuds continue to impress. Battery life is an acceptable 3 hours (acceptable for true wireless that is), with a further 6 provided by the charging case, and sound quality is rich and full.

Our only real reservation with the headphones is an occasional spotty connection between the two earbuds themselves (which rarely lasts for as much as a full second), and a lack of volume controls on the earbuds themselves (instead your options are limited to playing, pausing, and skipping your music).

If you're after noise-cancellation and decent sound quality with your earbuds, then the WF-1000X are the way to go. 

Read the full review: Sony WF-1000X

One of the earliest true wireless sets of earphones is still among the best. The Onkyo W800BT arrived to demonstrate these kind of earphones could sound much better than AirPods, and they continue to flatten most of the competition for sound quality.

Richer, wider and with much better stereo separation and ‘air’ than most, these are a truly satisfying listen. The cohesiveness and detail of the mid-range also hugely outclasses most other earphones of this kind. What else did you expect from Onkyo?

The snag is that their wireless performance is not perfect, especially when you compare them to newer cheaper pairs. 

Walking around with them in, you have to put up with occasional blips and some weird drop outs between the master and slave earpieces. 

Other parts of the tech aren’t quite up to some newer pairs either. Battery life of three hours per charge is only worth a shrug, and the charger case isn’t as neat as some. 

We’re not massive fans of the bulbous look either. You can tell the family resemblance with Onkyo’s bigger headphones, but they’re a little large and ungainly. 

Still, if sound quality matters most they are winners regardless.

Jam has made some cracking budget wireless speakers in its time, so we’re not too surprised it has nailed a few elements of the mid-price Jam Ultra wireless earphones. 

First, their design is innocuous in just the right way. They have a tough-looking nylon weave exterior, but don’t instantly attract attention like a pair of AirPods. They’re tasteful, for earphones made by a company called Jam at any rate. 

Wireless performance is also fantastic. Even on the occasional time when there was a bit of interference between the two earpieces, the secondary one simply fades out, rather than cutting out abruptly. 

The Jam Ultra charge case is neat too, and small enough to fit in a pocket. It’s a good job, as the 3-hour battery life isn’t too impressive. 

Sound quality is fair, but we’re disappointed by the leaden, clunky bass. There’s good soundstage width and the Jam Ultra are an all-round easy and full-sounding listen, but they’d be much better without the excess warmth and upper bass gumming everything up. 

If you like your sound bottom-heavy and fat, step right up, though. The price and design are both good.

The Sol Republic Amps Air look a little similar to the Jam Ultra. This is no great surprise as both companies are owned by HoMedics, master of massage products. Tech works in mysterious ways. 

These headphones are far from identical, though. The Sol Republic Amps Air have a scalloped rubberised finish, and the entire back of each earpiece is a big concave button. 

They are among the better-looking true wireless earphones at this price, mainly because they don’t stick out too far and don’t expand sideways too much either. Not everyone will love the ‘urban’ edge that most Sol Republic earphones have, though. 

The Amps Air are “water and rain” resistant according to Sol Republic, which seems to suggest they’ll be fine as long as you don’t wash the apertures under a tap. They use three little power connectors that interface with the charging carry case.

As with a lot of current true wireless earphones, battery life is a pretty dismal three hours. However, the case has enough charge for up to a mammoth 15 refreshes. You can feel the satisfying density of it too: it’s more external battery than carry case. 

Bluetooth signal reliability is very solid, with only very occasional interference. 

The Sol Republic Amps Air sound is decent, but perhaps best suited to exercise or very casual listening. Bass is very powerful, and it’s matched with pronounced but not ear-slashing treble and upper mids. 

It’s a sort of balance, if not audiophile one. The meat of the mids is limited. You get impact and energy, but not an entirely natural or refined take on your tunes. For use at the gym or during runs, the Amps will work well, though. 

The Kitsound Comet True Wireless are about the cheapest AirPod-a-like earphones you’ll find in actual shops. Your other options are ultra-low price Chinese manufacturers we struggle to trust most of the time. 

Most of these won’t get you the solid wireless performance of this Kitsound pair either. While even the most expensive first-wave AirPod imposters tended to suffer from flaky Bluetooth signal, the Kitsound Comet True Wireless are remarkably good. 

It’s a sign the new chipsets behind this kind of wireless transmission are getting much, much better. There are now few cut-outs, and no ugly garbled digital distortion. They work well.

There is a noise bed you’ll notice if listening to podcasts rather than music, though, and sound quality isn’t up to much. Hard-edged, sibilant and thin, we’ve heard earphones bundled with phones sound better. There’s also a sound level mis-match between the earpieces, the right sounding slightly louder than the left. 

We wouldn’t use these as our main earphones. And they don’t have the oomph to make great gym or running headphones either. If you care a lot about sound quality, the Kitsound Comet True Wireless aren’t for you. 

They are also less convenient than more expensive pairs, using little microUSB sockets on each bud rather than a case. Battery life is decent in this class, though, at four hours. 

Poor sound quality would put us off these earphones, but making a true wireless pair this cheap that works very well on a pure technical level ears Kitsound a few plaudits. 

Many of you will not have heard of Uunique before. It normally makes phone cases and accessories, making the Uunique London Freedom True Wireless one of its techiest products yet. 

They are so tech-packed they have more going on than most big-name competitors, actually. As well as true wireless transmission, the Uunique London Freedom True Wireless have active noise cancellation. This is where microphones on the back of the earpieces are used to pipe through inverse sound waves to cancel ambient noise. 

The effect isn’t particularly pronounced, miles off what you get with a Bose set. However, it does seem to attenuate bass noise a little, which is handy for commuters. 

It does have an effect on battery life, though. The Uunique London Freedom True Wireless are quoted as having just 2.5 hours battery life, and in our experience it actually edges closer to the 2-hour mark. Given this low stamina, the battery charger case is a little too large. You’ll need to use it a lot. This plastic puck may look good on a table, but with this regularity of charging we want something that’ll fit in a pocket a bit easier. 

The main black mark on the Uunique London Freedom True Wireless is something else: signal reliability. Cut-outs, blips and momentary loss of signal between the two earpieces are too common. You can improve this a little by moving your phone closer to the main earpiece, and making sure there are no interfering metal objects nearby (your keys), but other sets at the price fare much better. 

Sound quality is decent, with no major skews such as ultra-booming bass or very soft treble. They’re fairly clear, although they are not particularly refined, with a hint of hardness in the upper mids. Detail is only moderate and the soundstage isn’t nearly as wide as the best. 

View iPhone X Face ID get stage fright at its Apple occasion debut

Revision: Apple has commented on situation, exposing that Face ID evidently worked as created, but that Federighi ended up being just locked from the jawhorse considering other folks managing the iPhone X beforehand. Complete details are below.

Just how dependable will Face ID be, the new facial recognition system built into Apple’s brand new iPhone X handset? It might probably require a little bit of fine tuning, if its first at Tuesday’s the big apple occasion ended up being anything to go by, and even though Apple has since commented on the situation, it does not alleviate all our issues.

Being demoed onstage by Craig Federighi, Apple’s senior vice president of computer software Engineering, Face ID seemed to have difficulty recognising the administrator so that you can unlock the iPhone X.

You can observe the shaky minute for action on re-run web page for the event’s livestream. It kicks in at only following the one hour, 35 minute and 30 moments point.

New technology, new creases to iron?

The face area ID system uses the iPhone X’s TrueDepth digital camera to ensure only the correct user gets use of the telephone’s innards. And it’s really a multi-tiered system that should allow it to work seamlessly and safely, according to Apple.

A dot projector is employed to create a precise map for the shape of that person in 3D, with 30,000 invisible dots identifying the curves of your mind and features. An infrared camera then checks out that pattern and captures an infrared image, utilising the two information sets to ensure a match regarding software part. There’s also a Flood Illuminator that uses infrared light to aid recognize users at nighttime.

Ended up being one of these simple elements struggling on stage? Whilst the Face ID system did in the course of time pick up Federighi’s features (after having a 2nd attempt), it had beenn’t the right demonstration Apple could have wished for. And, based on our guy on the floor Gareth Beavis in their on the job: iPhone X review, it had been problematic at post-event demo area too.

Apple’s simply take

Yahoo has because got touching an Apple rep whom explained that “people had been managing the product for phase demo in advance and didn’t recognize Face ID was wanting to authenticate their face. 

“After a deep failing numerous times, since they weren’t Craig, the iPhone did just what it absolutely was built to do, which was to need his passcode.” This basically means, “Face ID worked since it was designed to.”

Facial recognition has received a poor rap in security circles previously, having been easy to hack, even though the elimination of Touch ID into the iPhone X makes Face ID’s precision of upmost value.

And offered TechRadar’s very own hands on experience with Face ID, it could not be fully refined even though it don’t fail on stage. But with the iPhone X shipping to customers this November, Apple includes a couple of weeks yet to fine-tune the system.

There exists a good chance that is not even close to final computer software at this very early phase, meaning Apple might have perfected the system by the time it reaches customers.

Safety in a increasingly-connected world is just a growing concern, even among the list of casual technology fan and, in many ways Apple has set elevated requirements for itself by developing the ever-reliable Touch ID fingerprint scanner. Here’s hoping it irons from Face ID creases, such that it can determine the ones inside our furrowed brows.

Apple has discontinued Apple Watch Series 2

Apple has discontinued the Apple Watch Series 2 and you can no longer buy it.

It is replaced by the new Apple Watch Series 3 that is offered in two versions, a pricier one with cellular connectivity and a cheaper one without it, plus the Apple Watch Series 1 remains available as the most affordable option.

Here are the prices for the models that are currently available:

  • Series 3 Sport 38mm GPS | Cellular: $330 | $400
  • Series 3 Sport 42mm GPS | Cellular: $360 | $430
  • Series 1 Sport 42mm: $280
  • Series 1 Sport 38mm: $250

Notice that the Cellular option retails for $70 more than the GPS-only version of the Apple Watch Series 3.

The Apple Watch Series 1 prices is now set at $250 for the 38mm size and $280 for the 42mm version.

Which one of these do you think is the best value for the money?

Will my iPhone 7/Plus case fit the new iPhone 8/Plus? Apple thinks so

The new iPhone 8 and 8 Plus come slightly taller, wider and thicker than their iPhone 7 and 7 Plus predecessors. The differences, however, are a fraction of an inch, so if you have been wondering whether your old case will fit the new phones, it probably will, at least according to Apple’s official accessory page. We just took a peak, and there the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus cases are listed as compatible with the 7 and 7 Plus. Oh, the joy. 

Not only Apple’s, but also all third-party wrappers from Otterbox and others are also listed as compatible with both phone generations, so if you have been thinking of keeping your favorite case you now have on your iPhone 7, and upgrading to the iPhone 8, for example, you will probably be able to fit the new phone in the old case without the help of a heat gun.

iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus come with smaller batteries, sizes revealed

The Apple iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus come with smaller sized batteries than earlier generation iPhones, and the iPhone 8 Plus in particular comes with the smallest battery ever used in a Plus-sized iPhone. The information comes from a listing of the new iPhones with Chinese regulator TENAA.

Interestingly, Apple says officially that the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus will last as long as previous iPhones and this is likely due to the more efficient Apple A11 Bionic chip.

Here are the newly-revealed iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus battery sizes:

So… what is the reason for those smaller battery sizes? Is it an attempt to make a thinner phone? Is it the new glass back and wireless charging that take up more space? We can only guess, but the reduced battery sizes are a fact.

Another curious detail that the listing confirms is the amount of RAM in the two new iPhones: 2GB of RAM in the iPhone 8 and 3GB of RAM in the iPhone 8 Plus.

This is far from the amount of RAM you get with most high-end Android phones that ship with 4GB or 6GB of the stuff, but keep in mind that Apple’s iOS is a different architecture that is a little bit better in handling those resources.

Google Pixel XL 2 passes through the FCC, won’t support T-Mobile’s 600MHz LTE network

In a curious choice of timing, Google decided to unveil the release date for its next generation of Pixel phones yesterday, just a day after Apple’s iPhone 8/X event. That’s just marketing 101, really — Google is simply using the opportunity to remind people that there are high-end options outside of Apple’s ecosystem.

And whether it’s a coincidence or not, today we’ve got another piece of news regarding the Pixel 2 series — the Pixel 2 XL, to be more precise. Namely, the device just passed through the Federal Communications Commission’s certification process.
Though one wouldn’t be able to tell it just from reading the publicly available paperwork: unlike with the smaller, HTC-made Pixel 2 which was certified about a month ago, the Pixel 2 XL docs have been carefully scrubbed of any revealing information this time — sorry, folks! In fact, the only reason we know this is the Pixel 2 XL is the model number, G011C, which was leaked back when LG was revealed as the manufacturer.
But there is one piece of info buried inside users in the U.S. might find interesting: unlike the LG V30, the Pixel 2 XL does not support T-Mobile’s brand-new 600 MHz LTE frequency, as the required band 71 isn’t listed in the documents. This, however, will only be bad news for people living in rural areas, as the rollout won’t reach major cities until at least 2020.

On the other hand, this means LG isn’t just slapping a new shell on an old phone and calling it the Pixel 2 XL, but is instead producing it independently — so we might just see some cool surprises once the duo is finally unveiled.

Oh, and about that release — it’s coming next month, on October 4th — so mark the date on your calendars. We already know a fair bit about the two Pixel 2 handsets, including some real-life photos of the smaller one, so to get the full info make sure to check out our rumor round-up.